Wish You Were a Better Memorizer? Why a Little Bit of “Verbalization” Might Be the Missing Ingredient.

Let’s try a little mental challenge.

Read the following letters to yourself, slowly: NCTECOOVD

Now, close your eyes, and see how many you can recall.

Maybe a handful?

Now read through the same letters, just organized differently: OCTNOVDEC

Easier, no?

It’s not like you became a better memorizer in the last few seconds – you simply recognized a familiar pattern in the second grouping of letters that made recall way easier.

Indeed, researchers have long recognized that identifying patterns and structure is a key ingredient in being better at memorization.

A famous chess study, for instance, found that when briefly shown images of chess positions for a few seconds, and then asked to recreate the position of all the pieces on the board, an expert chess player demonstrated much better recall than a novice and amateur player. However, when the pieces were “scrambled,” and placed in positions that would be unlikely (or impossible) in a real game, the expert was no better than the novice and amateur at recreating the placement of chess pieces.

Is it possible that the same could be true for memorizing music as well? That great memorizers don’t necessarily have inherently better memory, but are simply more effective at identifying patterns and structure among the notes on the page?

Rote memorization vs. repetition + “verbalization”

Researchers at Indiana University recruited twenty violinists and violists1 to practice a short 18-measure etude.

The etude was easy enough to sight-read, but not easy enough to memorize in 10 repetitions.

One group of musicians (the repetition-only group) was asked to play through the etude 10 times. Then, after a 30-second break, the music was taken away, and they were asked to play as much of the etude as they could, from memory.

The other group of musicians (the repetition+analysis group), was also asked to play the etude 10 times, but then they were given 6 minutes to complete a written worksheet with prompts about the etude’s musical character, and its harmonic, structural, and rhythmic features. After completing this brief written analysis, or “verbalization,” the score was taken away, and they were asked to play the etude from memory.

The repetition+analysis group managed to recall slightly more of the etude than the repetition-only group – but this difference was slight, and not statistically significant (49% vs. 43%).

So at first glance, regular ‘ol memorization through repetition appears to work just fine. And the extra 6 minutes of score-study and analysis was perhaps a waste of time.

24 hours later…

But then again, what really counts is not how much you remember today, but how much you remember tomorrow, right?

So to gauge the impact of the score-study/analysis on long-term learning, participants were asked to return 24 hours later to see how much of the etude they still could play from memory.

This time there was a significant difference between the two groups.

While the repetition+analysis group still remembered a respectable 38% of the etude, the repetition-only group managed to recall just 18% of the etude.

What was on the worksheet???

So what was on this score-study worksheet that made such a difference in their memory?

Here are the prompts the researchers asked the musicians to respond to:

Please provide the information requested below.

  • Discuss the musical character of the etude:
  • Discuss the musical high points:
  • Discuss characteristic phrase structures of this etude:
  • Discuss characteristic rhythmic motives of this etude:
  • What keys or tonal centers are present in this etude:

Narrative analysis

  • Please provide a detailed analysis of the etude beginning in measure 1 and working to the end:


1. Look for patterns

Sitting through hours of private theory lessons, pre-college classes, and theory courses in school, I often wondered why I needed to know anything about inversions, cadences, or the difference between a half-diminished and fully-diminished seventh chord.

Well, as it turns out, it’s not just something schools make you take so they can fill out your course schedule, but it’s about learning the underlying structure and form and patterns that make music work.

Where the more of a piece’s building blocks you can discern and appreciate, the less arbitrary and note-y it will probably seem in your head. And the easier it will be to “chunk” all of that into memory.

2. Use your words!

Leon Fleisher once asked a chamber music group to describe what they were trying to convey in a particular passage. And when they offered only a general, vague description of the character of the passage (“happy”), he pushed them to elaborate on the description, and give it much more specificity and vividness.

He explained that if you can’t verbally articulate what you’re going for, it’s a sign that you don’t have a clear enough idea of what you want. And if you don’t know what you want, you’re probably not going to get it.

Indeed, the process of crystalizing abstract thoughts into words certainly seems to be a vital part of developing the character of a piece. But the IU study also speaks to the role of verbalization in memory too, and “the importance of developing a conceptual understanding of to-be-learned music and not relying on procedural memory alone to give memorized performances.” (emphasis mine).

Take action

Working on a new piece that isn’t quite memorized yet? Try whip out a blank sheet of paper, open up your score, and jot down some answers to the prompts in the yellow box above. See if that forces your brain to work a little harder – and leads to better recall as you deepen your knowledge of the piece beyond “muscle memory” alone.

Not exactly a theory wiz? That’s ok – it’s still worth giving it a shot. Watch this entertaining TED talk , where Ben Zander deconstructs a Chopin Prelude for a non-musical audience, painting a picture of how even a basic outline of a piece’s structure can make it more meaningful to both performer and listener.


  1. Average age=21, ~14 years of study, ~6 years of formal theory training, ~3 hours of practice per day

Ack! After Countless Hours of Practice...
Why Are Performances Still So Hit or Miss?

It’s not a talent issue. And that rush of adrenaline and emotional roller coaster you experience before performances is totally normal too.

Performing at the upper ranges of your ability under pressure is a unique skill – one that requires specific mental skills, and perhaps a few other tweaks in your approach to practicing too. Elite athletes have been learning these techniques for decades; if nerves and self-doubt have been recurring obstacles in your performances, I’d like to help you do the same.

Click below to learn more about Beyond Practicing – a home-study course where you’ll explore the 6 skills that are characteristic of top performers. And learn how you can develop these into strengths of your own. And begin to see tangible improvements in your playing that transfer to the stage.


2 Responses

  1. Hi Noa! It’s very interesting that you suggested this topic. One of the most important aspect of music’s career is the ability to recall information (as well in any kind of profession). Once I read that one of the most beneficial things that you can do for your memory is the fact of association with different features (combining senses), the more information you can tell about something the easier to remember. I hope science could give us more strategies for this practice. Take care!

  2. I study math at university and the same principles apply – to remember huge proofs that can be multiple paragraphs or pages long you need to see the overall picture and flow of the proof. If you can remember the major sections of the proof, stringing them together is much easier. Otherwise it’s easy to get lost.
    I really like the worksheet that you’ve provided and think it might be helpful to add questions that ask about breaking down the piece into large chunks? Going beyond common terminology like intro, development, main theme, etc… would definitely be better but probably hard to think up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Get the (Free) Practice Hacks Guide

Learn the #1 thing that top practicers do differently, plus 7 other strategies for practice that sticks.

Do you know your mental strengths and weaknesses?

If performances have been frustratingly inconsistent, try the 4-min Mental Skills Audit. It won't tell you what Harry Potter character you are, but it will point you in the direction of some new practice methods that could help you level up in the practice room and on stage.