After Countless Hours of Practice, Why Are Performances Still so Hit or Miss?
It’s not a talent issue. And that rush of adrenaline and emotional roller coaster you experience before performances is totally normal too.
Performing at the upper ranges of your ability under pressure is a unique skill – one that requires specific mental skills and a few tweaks in your approach to practicing. Elite athletes have been learning these techniques for decades; if nerves and self-doubt have been recurring obstacles in your performances, I’d like to help you do the same.
Click below to discover the 7 skills that are characteristic of top performers. Learn how you can develop these into strengths of your own. And begin to see tangible improvements in your playing that transfer to the stage.
NOTE: Version 3.0 is coming soon! A whole new format, completely redone from the ground up, with new research-based strategies on practice and performance preparation, 25 step-by-step practice challenges, unlockable bonus content, and more. There will be a price increase when version 3.0 arrives, but if you enroll in the “Lifetime” edition before then, you’ll get all the latest updates for free.
I should start getting out of bed in the morning.
I’m an acrobat and dancer and have been following your blog
for a while since all of your tips are just as appropriate whether
your instrument is a trumpet or your body. I find that removing the
aspect of self-judgement implicit in ‘should’ is very helpful. My
coach a few years back also told me to remove the word ‘try’ from
my vocabulary … it goes without saying you ARE trying, but
thinking that way has an implicit expectation of failure I feel. I
know what you’re getting at with the future focussed ‘next time’
thing; but I also believe it is important to have a lot of
now-based vocabulary to keep yourself in the present moment when
actually practicing. For example I found for ages my technique was
suffering because I was constantly thinking “I’m going to do… x y
z” whereas “I AM doing… x y z” puts me in more of a flow state
where I get the best results more effortlessly. Anyway keep up the
good work, love this blog. Many thanks, Matt
Interesting suggestion – thanks Matt!
Personally, I’m fond of the phrase “I want to…” as in “I want to play my scales more perfectly” or “I want to play a certain concerto from memory by the end of this month” or even “I want to practice x amount of time today.” When I convince myself I want to do something, it makes it less of a chore and more of an exciting goal, and I usually leave the practice room feeling like I accomplished something.
Nice substitution – “want” certainly feels like a more helpful word than “should” or its cousin “need to” or “have to”
Great article! Personally, I find that the phrase “Doing x
will help me because…” is the best motivation for me. Whether
it’s scales, cleaning the house, or changing an aspect of my diet,
I like to focus on why I should do it and the benefits that it will
bring to me. It makes me want to get up off the couch and do it
instead of wallowing in guilt from the “I should.”
Remembering why you want to do something in the long run is a great strategy – thanks for sharing!
There’s more than “shoulda” to be eliminate…there’s also
“woulda” and “coulda” to be eliminated
Absolutely! My hack around this has been to practice things
that sound inspiring to me, while staying diligent, i.e. avoid
noodle based practicing but still inspiration based.
Thanks for the Calvin and Hobbes. Nice way to start my
Sunday AM.
I should:
1.Be more proactive in promoting myself in order to find work: gigs, lessons, etc. I find it very hard to talk about myself. I know you have to but, it’s very strange. It is almost like you have to learn to separate you, yourself from you, the performer, teacher, etc.
Hi Chris,
Oof, that’s a good one. I think we all struggle with this, but for what it’s worth, something that helped me was learning that we actually don’t have to talk about ourselves to promote ourselves. Meaning, the less we talk about how qualified we are, and the more we talk about our students’ needs, wants, and frustrations – and the more help we can provide them to improve their situation – the more they will trust us to help them get to their desired destination.
It’s like going to the doctor. If we feel like they took the time to understand our specific complaint, we’ll usually trust them more and take their advice (whether they’re right or wrong). If we don’t feel like the doctor took the time to hear our complaints, we tend not to trust them or like them very much – even if they are totally correct.
My “favorite should” is: I should do more outreach.
I’ve used “need to” in the past — mostly in terms of needing to balance my free time better. It’s a matter of trying to find a way to identify problems that doesn’t point a finger for not identifying them sooner. It’s almost easier to do it without thinking too much on it — too much thinking can be distracting. Identify what needs to get done and then stop mulling. (If only it were as easy to do as it is to say … )
It is just amazing how replacing the ‘should’s with the ‘will’s change the whole outlook. Many years back I used to use a similar concept – telling myself ‘next time’ whenever I screwed something up. Over time, I lost it somewhere. Thanks a lot. I have learnt a lot from your posts. Thanks to you, I also have developed a habit of regular practice which I am very happy about.
I wish I had a transmogrifier
“Should ” implies judgement and too much analysis. I like to think of my practice time as fun. How much fun can I add to my scales today? How many different rhythms can I think of? How fast? How slow? To analyze is to paralize. Let’s not waste precious moments with self judgements
Don’t should on yourself, or anyone else for that matter.
Years back I listened to a set of tape on stress and anxiety. The author advised that people “stop shoulding all over themselves”. This has been one of my favorite phrases to use when teaching. Also good advice to myself.
Lovely post, Dr. Kageyama. Sage advice!
To take it one step further, after you replace “should” with “will”, make sure it’s specific so you’ll follow through. For example, “I will wake up at 7AM and go for a jog after breakfast.” That works much better than “I will wake up at 7AM.”
My frequent ‘should’ is ‘I should be writing.’ I get sidetracked on research too much these days– I don’t know if that’s a good thing.
Great article, Noa! I’ve shared it with some of my peeps who say ‘should’ a lot more than they should. 🙂
Nice! Psychologists call these specific goals “implementation intentions” and the research suggests that they really do help us stay on track.
If you feel like you should be doing something important to you and you are not doing that thing then as you say that brings up a whole host of problems like guilt, am I worthy, am I lazy, maybe I don’t have what it takes. It is irrational because there is nothing that say’s you “should” be doing anything. Also we tend to speak like this rather casually and may be telling it to someone else to get some sort of feedback from them but may not actually believe it yet I heard somewhere that our subconscious mind takes our thoughts literally and at face value and does not differentiate between what is true or not.
Awhile back I learned to replace should with I prefer. I’d prefer to be practicing right now but I’m not. That gives me a choice without implying that I am somehow falling short.
[…] Why We Should Eliminate “Shoulds” From Our Vocabulary
(Bulletproof Musician) – Anther wonderful post from the
Bulletproof Musician about the mental game of music. This time
he’s looking at why “should”
isn’t always very helpful. […]
What’s worse is using the word “should” and not really knowing what you should be doing anyways. I think it’s important to make sure you are doing what you like and not always what you THINK you should be doing.
Research (I found it here: http://www.amazon.com/Makes-Brain-Happy-Should-Opposite/dp/1616144831 and here:http://blogs.hbr.org/ideacast/2013/02/why-were-all-in-sales.html) talks about a Bob the Builder method for self talk.
Bob, for those who don’t know, is a popular children’s television character. Each episode he and and his viewers are faced with challenges, to which Bob responds with his catchphrase question and answer: ‘Can we fix it? Yes, we can!’
(see here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-P2-Nmk1uFQ)
The point is, rather than thinking ‘I should x, y or z’ we might try the interrogative frame and ask ourselves ‘Can I x, y or z?’
The argument is that framing things with a question is a more effective way to set our mind up to: a) start building motivation and b) identifying steps that can help us meet challenges successfully.
For instance: Can I do a better job on my warm up today? Well, considering yesterday’s was pretty lame, believe me, yes, I can…
I also do my best to avoid “try.”
The only useful “shoulds” are:
The consequence of an action that you’re testing such as “The feather and hammer should strike the moon surface at the same time if dropped from the same height.”
Or as a directive or rule like “You should stop at a stop sign.”
Both of these have no emotional baggage attached them and can simply be answered with a “yes” or “no.”
I should be able to play guitar chords better than I can now. I’ve spent weeks working on the same handful of chords and it’s just not coming together like it used to.
I started playing three years ago, and these were the first things I studied. I was awesome at them after a few months, but here’s the problem – I wasn’t using a metronome at all.
Now, I’m trying to rectify that mistake, but it doesn’t help that in the absence of actually having any rhythmic context (i.e. songs to play using the chords I knew) and being able to play them in time to a beat I got bored of chords and moved away from them.
Now, I’ve gotten back into studying them, but I find myself saying, “I’ve spent x number of weeks on this, I should be better than this by now.”
Maybe I need to say, “I’ve spent x number of weeks on this and I’ll spend x more on it if I have to. I’ll get this right or at least get one step closer today.”
“Should” is a killer word, and needs to be left out of the vocabulary of musicians because it forces us to run a race behind some ghost runner that we never catch up to. To say “should” means that we’re comparing ourselves to some perceived entity that somehow can do everything we want to and remains the subject of our constant envy. The only way to become the musicians we want to be is to accept our limitations but diminish them through practice. It’s our own race to be won, only that we become better than we were in the past by our own reckoning, not someone else’s opinion.
[…] bother … I should just quit now …’” says psychologist and master violinist Dr. Noa Kageyama. “And pretty soon we’re sitting on the couch watching reruns of The Office and eating a […]
[…] bother … I should just quit now …’” says psychologist and master violinist Dr. Noa Kageyama. “And pretty soon we’re sitting on the couch watching reruns of The Office and eating […]
[…] bother … I should just quit now …’” says psychologist and master violinist Dr. Noa Kageyama. “And pretty soon we’re sitting on the couch watching reruns of The Office and eating […]
[…] I even bother … I should just quit now …'” says psychologist and master violinist Dr. Noa Kageyama. “And pretty soon we’re sitting on the couch watching reruns of The Office and eating […]
[…] Dr. Noa Kageyama agrees. He says “shoulds” make us focus on the problem instead of the solution and […]
[…] I even bother … I should just quit now …'” says psychologist and master violinist Dr. Noa Kageyama. “And pretty soon we’re sitting on the couch watching reruns of The Office and […]
I should be practicing, I should be exercising, I should be cleaning the house, I should be prepping my classes, I should be calling my sick friend, I should be taking the dogs out, I should be writing…for me shoulds don’t come singly but in a swarm, like midges.
I’ve tried saying “I WANT to practice today,” but I can tell I’m lying (usually.)
What if I said “I SHOULD eat the rest of that Ikea chocolate and play Zombie Run”?
Ha, that’s interesting. Like reverse psychology. Give it a try and let me know how it goes!
“Stick and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me.” You are correct that that is baloney. But, only if you believe the words. Ultimately, words cannot hurt us. Only the words of the thoughts that we ourselves believe can hurt us. If someone says I’m a lousy musician, that does not have to hurt me. If they say I’m a lousy musician, and prohibit me from getting work, it’s the prohibiting of work that hurts me. Their words only hurt me if they act upon them. Ultimately, it’s the activity that hurts me. And only the activity that hurts me. Likewise, if someone says I’m a lousy musician, and only says it, without doing any activity regarding it, their words only hurt me as much as I give them importance. If their words are accurate, even then they cannot hurt me. They can reveal a truth, but that’s it. How I choose to react to it is entirely within my capability. The more we are aware of our own thoughts, the more power we have to take charge of our own behavior. The more independently we think for ourselves, the less someone else’s words can hurt me. Ultimately, somebody else’s words cannot hurt me if I am accepting of myself, regardless of my performance.
[…] even bother … I should just quit now …'” says psychologist and master violinist Dr. Noa Kageyama. ”And pretty soon we’re sitting on the couch watching reruns of The Office and eating […]