Why Practicing While Distracted Is Actually Very Important (Sometimes)

Like any other child, I had many moments when I wished I could practice while reading a book or watching TV. Like passing the time while driving by listening to music, I thought it would be awesome to be able to simply move my fingers while engaged in some other more entertaining activity, and still make progress.

I tried (and failed) to make that work, and am surely not the only one who has attempted to multitask in this way.

Indeed, practicing while distracted is pretty much universally regarded as a big no-no.

But is it really so bad?

The intuitive answer is yes, but a recent study suggests that the answer is not as black and white as one might think.

Distractions vs. no distractions?

Researchers at Brown University were curious to test the assumption that being distracted during learning, would result in poorer performance. So, they devised a test to see what would happen when individuals were allowed to learn a motor task while totally focused on the task at hand vs. when they had to learn the task while distracted.

They had 48 volunteers practice a simple motor task which involved using a stylus/touchpad to drag a cursor to a target on a computer screen.

The task started off easily enough, but after 40 trials, the computer rotated the controls by 45 degrees, so that the participant would have to adjust their movements on the touchpad and overcorrect by 45 degrees in order to hit the desired targets. Sort of like adjusting for the slope of a putting green in golf, where instead of hitting the ball straight at the cup, you have to hit at an angle in order to get the ball to end up going straight.

As the participants struggled to adjust to the more challenging motor task and direct the cursor to the correct target, some were also tasked with counting certain symbols that flashed on their screen. Other participants saw the flashing symbols, but were told to ignore them.

After 160 such practice trials, they were asked to do another 80 non-rotated trials (to allow some forgetting to set in and get them out of rhythm a bit – sort of like how football coaches will often call a timeout to “ice” the kicker before they make a field goal attempt).

Then, it was time for a test to see how much of the training stuck. The computer re-rotated the controls 45 degrees, and the participants had 80 chances to successfully hit the targets.

One group of participants never had to deal with the symbols – neither during the practice trials nor during the test trials.

Another group of participants always had to deal with the distracting symbol-counting task – both during practice and the test.

And then there were a few groups which had to deal with the distractions at either practice or testing, but not both.

Who did best?

Intuitively, you might think that the group which never had to deal with distractions would do best, followed perhaps by the group which was able to practice in peace, but tested with distractions.

As it turns out, the group which never had to deal with distractions and the group which always had to deal with distractions actually performed about the same.

It was the “either” groups that struggled. Surprisingly, for those who learned the task while dealing with distractions, taking those distractions away during the test made performance worse (and vice versa).

The researchers did a follow-up study to dig a little deeper, and tweaked the study so that participants would have to deal with a different distraction during the test than what they encountered in the practice trials.

The results stayed the same, suggesting that the nature of the distractions may be less important than the presence of the distractions. As in, it didn’t matter whether the distractions during practice and testing were the same or not. It only mattered that the distractions be present (or not present) at both practice and testing.

Take action

So what does this all mean?

I don’t think this is an open invitation to practice or do one’s warmups while watching TV or browsing the internet.

It’s about strategically practicing with and without distractions.

For instance, we don’t want to be so accustomed to practicing in complete quiet and solitude, that we get thrown by noises in the audience when we walk on stage.

Conversely, we don’t want to be so accustomed to practicing in a practice room surrounded by the comforting (or annoying) din of others’ music-making, that the deathly silence of a screened audition becomes overly distracting.

photo credit: hj_west via photopin cc

Ack! After Countless Hours of Practice...
Why Are Performances Still So Hit or Miss?

It’s not a talent issue. And that rush of adrenaline and emotional roller coaster you experience before performances is totally normal too.

Performing at the upper ranges of your ability under pressure is a unique skill – one that requires specific mental skills, and perhaps a few other tweaks in your approach to practicing too. Elite athletes have been learning these techniques for decades; if nerves and self-doubt have been recurring obstacles in your performances, I’d like to help you do the same.

Click below to learn more about Beyond Practicing – a home-study course where you’ll explore the 6 skills that are characteristic of top performers. And learn how you can develop these into strengths of your own. And begin to see tangible improvements in your playing that transfer to the stage.

Comments

15 Responses

  1. I often *get* to practice with kids in the background (sometimes right next to me on the bench!), and it helps deal with distractions that are present at jazz and rock gigs. So, among other wonderful things, my kids have helped me improve as a performer! So, I’d say that based on my own n=1, there’s something to this study.

  2. What the study tells me is to do the very best you can to simulate your performance enviornment when practicing. How would one do that when there is no audience?

    1. Easier said than done, but many have utilized a variety of methods, from playing for friends/family on occasion, to colleagues, to taping oneself, to even performing for one’s pets or stuffed animals. It doesn’t have to be exactly the same for us to transfer a good bit of what we learn in “training” environments to the real thing.

  3. It all comes to the same point, ever : when it comes to practicing, **habits** are the evil : always try to practice in (even slightly) different conditions.
    Including switching instruments, of course

  4. I’m a dance instructor, but I see a lot of carryover in your advice. It’s important to practice in conditions similar to when you will be performing for real, to reduce the likelihood of something throwing you off.

  5. Nice insight. Practicing with distractions can be practice in itself. When something goes wrong live you need the experience to be able to deal with it at the moment, without the audience noticing.

  6. I’m really pleased to read this!! All my friends at college thought I was nuts for practicing with distractions before performances.. I used to put bright lights into my eyes (because of stage lightings..), asking friends to ring each others phones in the room, and even whisper to each other, play with their bags’ zippers, make unexpected noises, sneez etc.. and I even made my hands wet, and jumped up and down to have my heart rate up, just to imitate the possible distractions in a concert!
    What I can never prepare for though, is memory lapses.. I know a lot of ways to memorise music, and if I am calm I never have memory problems, but I get very nervous about forgetting the music, and this sort of ruins the whole experience very often!
    Do you think you could find something about how to recall music under stress? Not about memorising, but remembering it, if that makes sense! 🙂

    Thanks

    1. I know next to nothing about this, but here’s how i’m Thinking;
      Memorising is one thing. Recall is another. So i suppose we need to practice recall. And like other techniques we need to practice it in lots different ways and test it to destruction. So, you can play your piece from memory? Now do it in front of a small audience. Now do it while your bringing out the bass line. Now the middle parts. Now while reading a book. Now after a five mile run. It goes wrong? Good, you’ve found a weakness you need to work on. And dragging this stuff out of your memory is strengthening the recall. Maybe this is rubbish, but let’s discuss.

  7. As a singer who tends to over-focus and end up nit-picking my way into over-thinking, I often find my best practice sessions are when I stop to text someone or check email between exercises. If I am learning a brand new technique that session I don’t do it, but to add freedom and keep myself from over-thinking, distractions are a great advantage. I’m glad to see some research that confirms this.

  8. Hmmm…am i the only one who has managed to read while playing? It is a veeery good way to test your memory, if you are able to play while reading…im pretty sure you have memorised it well

  9. Haha, we totally do this! We practice in public places (acoustic) and play our music in front of little kids first! Gets the nerves out. We also do a lot of videos and pretend like it’s our final take. Pressure on!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Get the (Free) Practice Hacks Guide

Learn the #1 thing that top practicers do differently, plus 7 other strategies for practice that sticks.

Do you know your mental strengths and weaknesses?

If performances have been frustratingly inconsistent, try the 4-min Mental Skills Audit. It won't tell you what Harry Potter character you are, but it will point you in the direction of some new practice methods that could help you level up in the practice room and on stage.

Share433
Tweet
Email