What Does Science Say About the Notion That We Don’t Utilize Our Full Potential?

There’s a really sweet moment in Pooh’s Most Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin, where Christopher Robin and Pooh are chatting in a tree, and Christopher Robin is gently preparing Pooh for the day when he might not be the constant presence that Pooh has become accustomed to.

As Pooh drifts off to sleep, Christopher Robin says “Always remember you are braver than you believe, stronger than you seem, and smarter than you think.” (watch the clip here )

The idea that we underestimate our true abilities is a nice sentiment – but is it true? Like, is there any concrete evidence suggesting that we truly do hold back, or underestimate what we are capable of?

Feats of strength!

Well, there are a number of studies that get at this question, many of them relatively recent, but one of my favorites dates back to 1979, where a pair of researchers (Ness & Patton) recruited 48 college students in various physical education classes (jogging, swimming, tennis, and springboard diving) to participate in a 6-week series of strength evaluations.

Once a week, each participant was asked to perform three feats of strength different tests of strength – an incline bench press, leg press, and leg extension.

Participants were given as many attempts as they needed, but the idea was to find out their 1-rep max – or the greatest amount of weight they could lift for one repetition. So each week, they’d go to the gym, try to set a new personal best, record their best attempt on a card, and give it to the experimenter.

A bit of deception

But unbeknownst to the participants, the experimenters occasionally manipulated the weights on the incline bench.

A third of the participants (control group) lifted with a normal set of weights from beginning to end, but for the other two-thirds of participants, the experimenters changed the labels on the weights in weeks 4 and 5, to find out how much of an impact participants’ expectations would have on the amount of weight they could lift.

Like, if the labels on the weights suggest that you’re lifting 105lbs, which was your max last week, but you actually have 125lbs on the bar, what will happen?

Lifting lighter or heavier

So after 3 weeks of normal lifting, in Week 4, Group A was provided with weights that were heaver than the labels suggested, while Group B lifted with weights that were lighter than the labels made them seem.

And then in Week 5, the manipulation was flip-flopped. So Group A lifted weights that were lighter than they were led to believe, while Group B lifted weights that were heavier than they were led to believe.

And then in Week 6, everyone lifted “blind.” As in, the experimenter set the weight, based on their previous test performances, so nobody knew exactly how much weight they were actually lifting.

So…did any of these mind games lead to any meaningful difference in performance?

Results

Well, indeed they did!

When participants didn’t know how much weight they were lifting (blind), all three groups maxed out at about the same amount of weight.

And when they were lifting with weights that were labeled to appear heavier than they actually were (light), they all maxed out at about the same weight too.

But when they were given weights that were labeled to appear lighter than they actually were (e.g. the weight said 25lbs, but it was actually 45lbs), on average, participants’ max improved by about 20lbs!

From: Ness, R. G., & Patton, R. W. (1979). The effect of beliefs on maximum weight-lifting performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3(2), 205–211.

Umm…so how does this apply to practicing and performing?

Takeaways

Well, I think this speaks to the fact that on a day to day basis, particularly in the practice room, we probably do hold back and neglect to explore the edges of our potential. Which isn’t to say that we should burn ourselves out, by trying to go 110% 24/7, but it brings to mind a saying that’s often repeated in sports – that “you play like you practice.”

For instance, I remembered reading this story about a self-defense class, where when practicing disarming an armed assailant, the instructor told students to NEVER hand the gun back to their partner, but to always do a full reset and start the drill with the gun on the ground. 

Why?

Because under pressure, we tend to default to whatever’s familiar, or whatever we’ve put into “muscle memory,” as it were. So as unbelievable as it sounds, practicing handing a gun back to your partner after disarming them increases the possibility that you might do that automatically, without thinking, in a real-life situation too.

Likewise, if we want to bring our “A game” in performances or auditions, and play near or at the upper edges of our ability, it seems we should make it a point to practice testing out our “A game” in the practice room too.

Meaning, if you want to use 100% of the variety and intensity of your vibrato in performance, you can’t just use 60-80% in the practice room and expect to find the rest on stage. Or if you get accustomed to playing with only 70% of your dynamic range in practice because using more than that sounds excessive in your living room, it’s going to be tough to flip a switch and bring the last 30% in a big hall when you really need it, without adding a lot of excess tension or inadvertently forcing the sound.

Because at the end of the day, it’s too risky, too scary, and too easy to mess up under pressure when you try to play at a higher level than you’ve gotten accustomed to playing at on a daily basis.

So how would one approach this, exactly? Well, there are a bunch of ways we could make this a pretty organic part of our daily practice.

Take action

For instance, at a recent workshop, violinist Pamela Frank noted that if we want to take risks on stage, we have to practice taking risks in the practice room too. Which means practicing with “1000% expressiveness” in the practice room – perhaps even with scales! Where instead of just going through the motion of playing scales, you can play scales with nuance and inflection and phrasing as well (she says more about this about halfway through this video ). 

Which of course makes perfect sense – and would probably make scales a little more fun as well!

Additional awesomeness

All of this also reminded me of how basketball players like Stephen Curry regularly add elements to their practice that are more challenging than what they’ll encounter in a game. For instance, here’s Curry shooting from near mid-court (aka “logo” shots) and from the tunnel (aka “tunnel shots”) as part of his normal pre-game warmups.

And why from the tunnel? No idea…I’m guessing that’s partly for kicks, but here’s more on that from an ESPN sport science video: Steph Curry’s Tunnel Shots

Additional randomness

Ok…so have you ever wondered how old Winnie the Pooh actually is? Like, is he a toddler bear cub, or an old senior bear?

It turns out there’s a real, concrete, definitive answer. And if you’re inclined to go down this rabbit hole, and have ~25 minutes, I highly recommend this podcast episode, which consults with a few experts, eventually nails down the answer, and might lead you to shed a tear or two (in a good way, of course): How Old Is Winnie the Pooh?


References

Ness, R. G., & Patton, R. W. (1979). The effect of beliefs on maximum weight-lifting performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01172606

Ack! After Countless Hours of Practice...
Why Are Performances Still So Hit or Miss?

For most of my life, I assumed that it was because I wasn’t practicing enough. And that eventually, if I performed enough, the nerves would just go away and everything would take care of itself.

But in the same way that “practice, practice, practice” wasn’t the answer, “perform, perform, perform” wasn’t the answer either. In fact, simply performing more, without the tools to facilitate more positive performance experiences, just led to more negative performance experiences!

Eventually, I discovered that elite athletes are successful in shrinking this gap between practice and performance, because their training looks fundamentally different. In that it includes specialized mental and physical practice strategies that are oriented around the retrieval of skills under pressure.

It was a very different approach to practice, that not only made performing a more positive experience, but practicing a more enjoyable experience too (which I certainly didn’t expect!).

If you’ve been wanting to perform more consistently and get more out of your daily practice, I’d love to share these research-based skills and strategies that can help you beat nerves and play more like yourself when it counts.

Click below to learn more about Beyond Practicing, and start enjoying more satisfying practice days that also transfer to the stage.

BOGO pricing is now in effect! (through 11:59pm Sunday)

Sign up anytime now through Sunday (Dec. 4) at 11:59pm Pacific, and you’ll receive a second bonus Beyond Practicing account – at no additional cost – that you can gift to a friend, colleague, family member, student, or teacher (i.e. a practice buddy to explore the course with 😁).

Click the red button below to learn more about the course and get the holiday buy-one-get-one-free offer.

Comments

3 Responses

  1. Question: Is there a statistically significant difference between Group A and Group B overall, or at least at the Heavy Condition? If so, wouldn’t that indicate that it would be better to front-load harder/more intense practice (like Group A did) before lightening up, instead of taking a load off (like Group B did) before stretching oneself later?

    1. Hi Mary,

      Good question. There wasn’t a statistically significant difference between Groups A & B during their heavy lifts, but there was a statistically significant interaction between groups and treatment. The authors explain that Group A had their heavy week two weeks before the final blind test, and seemed to chalk the difficult day up to a “bad day” when compared to the prior and subsequent week, and had no reason to expect a poor performance during the blind test. Whereas those in Group B who lifted heavy the week before the blind test, following the light week, seemed to interpret their struggle as evidence that they were losing strength (e.g. “I must be getting weaker” and “It’s been a long, hot summer!”).

      So now that I’m looking at the Fig. 1 graph again, I wonder if the explanation in the legend is mixed up. Like, I think A did heavy, light, then blind, while B did light, heavy, then blind, but that’s not what the legend says…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15585

Join 48,000+ musicians!

Get the latest research-based tips to level up in the practice room and on stage, from one week to the next.

You'll also receive other insider resources like the weekly newsletter and a special 6-day series on essential research-based practice strategies that will help you get more out of your daily practice and perform more optimally on stage. (You can unsubscribe anytime.)

Download a

PDF version

Enter your email below to download this article as a PDF

Click the link below to convert this article to a PDF and download to your device.

Download a

PDF version

All set!

Discover your mental strengths and weaknesses

If performances have been frustratingly inconsistent, try the 3-min Mental Skills Audit. It won't tell you what Harry Potter character you are, but it will point you in the direction of some new practice methods that could help you level up in the practice room and on stage.

Share354
Tweet10
Email