In Season 8 of the tv show Friends, Alec Baldwin makes a guest appearance, playing Parker, a character who is over-the-top-enthusiastic about everything. Who at one point, can no longer contain his excitement, and tries to capture a mental snapshot of the moment (watch the clip here ).
That episode aired in 2002. Months before the first phone with a built-in camera would be available in the US, and five years before the release of the first iPhone.
Nowadays, of course, camera phones are everywhere. So there’s no need to capture a “mental” snapshot of anything.
But are we worse off for it?
I mean, go to any restaurant, park, sporting event, or school play, and people are taking pictures and videos left and right.
Which can sometimes be super annoying. Like, when you’re trying to watch your kid in their dance concert, and the person in front of you has a giant iPad blocking your line of sight. Or whose phone is taking up a big chunk of the frame in the video you’re trying to – oh, wait… 😳
But let’s put aside the question of how our phonetography obsession affects the experience of people around us, because I think that’s probably pretty clear. The more interesting question is – what effect does taking photos have on our experience of these moments?
I can definitely remember times when I have put my phone away, and smiled smugly at the clearly less psychologically savvy folks around me, thinking that experiencing my surroundings through my eyes, rather than through the screen of my device, was enabling me to have a more enjoyable experience than they were having.
But is this any truth to this? Does taking photos actually detract from our enjoyment of an experience? Or have I just become a mindfulness snob?
A team of researchers (Diehl, Zauberman, & Barasch, 2016) conducted a series of nine studies, across a variety of situations, to see how taking photos affects our enjoyment of an experience.
A bus tour of Philadelphia
The first study involved a bus tour of Philadelphia. Half of the participants were given a digital camera and encouraged to take pictures during the tour (“People often take photos of their experiences. During your tour, please use the camera provided to take photos as you normally would in this context. Please take at least 10 photos during your experience.”), while the other half were asked to leave all their belongings and cell phones behind, and were simply told to go about the tour as they would any other sightseeing experience (“Please experience the tour as you normally would when going on a sightseeing tour.”).
When the tour was over, they completed a short survey, in which they were asked to rate their enjoyment of the tour, and how “immersed” they felt in the experience on a scale of 1-15 (1=not at all; 15=extremely).
So what happened? Did taking photos take away from their enjoyment of the tour?
Well, actually, no. If anything, taking photos increased their enjoyment of the tour, as the photo group rated the experience as being a little more enjoyable than the non-photo-taking group (11.13 vs. 10.23 – which was a statistically significant difference).
Hmm…ok, I guess sightseeing and taking pictures generally go hand in hand, so perhaps that’s not surprising. But what about something more mundane, like a meal at a food court?
Lunchtime at Reading Terminal Market
In a second study, 149 people visiting a historic farmers market in Philadelphia were asked to participate in a quick study in exchange for a candy bar.
Those that agreed were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. Half were asked to take at least three photos of their dining experience while eating (photo group). The other half were simply instructed to eat their meal as they normally would (control group) – and were neither encouraged nor discouraged from taking photos.
A few folks in the control group did end up taking photos, but as expected, those in the photo group took significantly more (an average of 4.48 photos for the photo group and .83 for the control group).
When participants were finished eating, they were given the same quick survey as in the bus tour study.
So did eating without the distraction of having to take photos lead to a more enjoyable meal?
Well, once again, not so much. Just like with the bus tour, those who took photos of their food actually reported enjoying their meal more than those in the control group (13.33 vs. 12.17).
Hmm…and why might this be?
Well, the participants who took photos reported feeling more immersed in the experience than those who didn’t (12.44 vs. 11.37). And it was this increased engagement in the experience that contributed to an increase in their enjoyment of the experience.
Eye-tracking at the museum
Indeed, when the researchers sent 51 students through an archeology museum while wearing eye-tracking gear, they found that those in the photo-taking group looked at key elements of the exhibits more frequently and for longer periods of time than those who didn’t take photos.
In other words, it seems that those who took photos engaged more actively with and paid greater visual attention to the details of the exhibits.
And once again, just as in the other studies, it was the folks who took photos, and were more engaged in the experience, who reported enjoying themselves more.
Hmm…so if the key factor here is your level of engagement, and not necessarily the photo itself, what if you pull a Parker and only imagine taking pictures?
A simulated bus tour of London
The researchers wondered this as well, and put together a simulated bus tour of London, where some participants were asked to take photos, others were asked to experience the tour as normal (no photos), and a third group was asked to simply plan the photos they would take if they had a camera (“As people often take pictures during events that they are experiencing, we also will ask you to plan out the photos you would take on the experience, as you would if you were actually there taking photos.”).
And how did taking mental photos affect their enjoyment of the tour?
Well, once again, participants who took photos on the tour reported enjoying the experience more than those who didn’t (5.36 vs. 4.76).
And, believe it or not, the enjoyment ratings of those who simply imagined taking photos was almost indistinguishable from those who actually took photos (5.46 vs. 5.36)!
So what are we to make of all of this?
Well, I think there are a few takeaways.
The first, is that the role of photography in our daily life appears to be a more nuanced and complex issue than I realized.
And that at least in some situations, maybe we should make a concerted effort to take more photos. In that whether it’s taking your dog on a long walk, baking cookies with your kids, or visiting family over the holidays, the research suggests that documenting our experiences through photos (or even “mental” snapshots) leads us to be a more actively engaged and attentive participant in the experience. Which in turn, heightens our enjoyment of it.
Of course, just because a little is good, doesn’t mean more is better. And the research doesn’t suggest that we should start Truman Show-ing every aspect of our lives. Because the authors note that there are a lot of other situations and factors that haven’t yet been fully explored.
For one, these studies all looked at capturing photos of one’s experience. Not video – which I suspect would be a very different psychological experience, given the different kind of focus that I think would be required when filming continuous video.
In addition, the live experiences in these studies – bus tour, having a meal, visiting a museum – were all relatively slow, predictable, or self-paced experiences. Trying to capture a key moment in a fast-moving and unpredictable event, on the other hand, like a big play at the end of a close basketball game, could be much more difficult, and take away from your ability to fully experience and enjoy the excitement of that moment.
And speaking of excitement, in situations where a key aspect of the experience is emotion-based – like watching your kid score their first goal, or sing a solo in a school musical – it could likewise be difficult to fully experience the emotional impact of that moment, if too much of your attention is diverted to the task of picture-taking.
And finally, there are some experiences in life that you may not be able to capture with a camera. Like a particularly beautiful sunset over a vast expanse of ocean, as you relax on a quiet beach with your family following an afternoon of kayaking. Where futzing around with all the settings on your camera in an effort to get the exposure just right, rather than simply taking it all in, will likely diminish your ability to feel the sense of awe or peace that’s probably a more meaningful part of the experience than the visuals per se.
A related podcast you might enjoy
Speaking of sunsets and capturing photos, this week’s study reminded me of a recent The Happiness Lab podcast episode that delved into the research on how sharing experiences with others can enhance happiness – if we do it right.
Episode 5: Caring What You’re Sharing
If you’re not familiar with The Happiness Lab podcast, it’s totally worth checking out. Most episodes are devoted to topics and research related to increasing happiness in daily life, but some episodes even get into performance-related concepts like imagery, that can totally be applied to preparations for your next audition or performance.
Diehl, K., Zauberman, G., & Barasch, A. (2016). How taking photos increases enjoyment of experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 119-140.
Does recording our practice and performance have this same “phonetography” enjoyment effect? If not, then why not? Or put another way, Is there a way to get the phonetography enjoyment feeling from making and listening to audio recordings of your own playing? Right now, the only way that I can listen to self recordings is with a critical ear searching for flaws and places needing improvement. Not exactly fun and entertaining.
Your articles are amazing. Always thought provoking and informative. Thank you!
Yeah, listening back critically to a performance can be a different experience from paying more attention to interesting things we see around us where there isn’t that element of critique/judgment. But with regards to listening back critically, it might help even here to think of it less as judgment and more as a puzzle that you haven’t yet solved, reminding yourself of times when you have solved other such puzzles, and sounded that much better for it.
I’m a photographer. My “enjoyment” of photography is a different thing from a full “emotional engagement.”
To explain, when I set out to photograph an event, that has to be my focus. And I really enjoy that. Otherwise I’m just taking snap shots. But when I want to enjoy an experience for the experience—sailing, a walk, a soccer game—I leave the camera home. I feel I missed out on moments when I am concentrating on composition, exposure and focus. And the social involvement is a distraction to my photography. And vice versa.
So the music analogy is this: when I want to relax and listen deeply to enjoy music, I listen. Playing is music enjoyment but on a different level, often not relaxing or enjoyable in the moment, but more so after accomplishing a difficult thing. I’m focused on executing fingering, dynamics, phrasing,—like exposure, composition, focus. Maybe another way of looking at it is passive enjoyment versus active involvement. Two different things.
Thanks for the perspective. I imagine being more skilled in photography and seeing the world in that way would be a different experience indeed. Along these lines, one of the studies looked at what might happen when the complexity of the photo-taking interface was increased (i.e. the ability to delete pictures after taking them, having to frame the shot more precisely, etc.). And this did indeed take the participants’ focus off of the experience, decreased their engagement in the experience, and seemed to make the experience less enjoyable.
This was an interesting question, but I think one aspect of our photo taking that might be particularly important for musicians was left out. That is the use of the camera to replace memory. We now often take pictures of things we want to remember, a wine bottle label, a tag on something, etc. I wonder what effect this has on memorization capabilities or our desire to remember things.
Good point. The authors note that the benefits of looking at photos after the fact is a different question, and didn’t look at this per se. Although they did find when checking back in after a week, that the perceived enjoyment of the experience was still higher at that time for those who took pictures than those who didn’t.
So it seems that we forget more when we take pictures – so I believe I read studies show – but we also enjoy more the experience. A little diversion from before the digital era when we used to have more memories of what we had enjoyed more.
Are we going towards a future where memories and feelings take two separate paths?
(Excuse the broken English)