Naps vs. Coffee. Which Is a Better Choice for the Sleep-Deprived Musician?
By Noa Kageyama, Ph.D.
Naps were a way of life for me in college (though it’s debatable whether a 4-hour “nap” still qualifies as such), and there are indications that napping is becoming a more culturally accepted practice as companies like Google, The Huffington Post, Zappos, and Nike are encouraging employees to nap instead of insisting that they try to simply power through the mental fog of a mid-day lull.
Indeed, the literature suggests that we can derive a whole range of benefits from sleep – from better focus and performance to happiness and apparently even greater attractiveness.
However, when we can’t get the sleep we need (and really, isn’t that all of us?), coffee or an “energy” drink still seem to be the old standbys.
Sure these can perk you up a bit. And yes, they can enhance concentration and attention. But what sort of impact does caffeine have on memory and learning?
Can caffeine keep you alert enough to think clearly and learn effectively, or is a good old fashioned power nap still the way to go?
Caffeine vs. sleep
Most studies on the effects of caffeine or sleep tend to focus on indicators like attention or wakefulness. This can yield helpful information when it comes to safety in the workplace or on the road, but it doesn’t shed much light on more cognitively demanding processes, like learning your part to a new piece before rehearsal in the morning.
So, a group of researchers at UC San Diego ran 61 participants through a series of cognitive tasks emphasizing verbal memory, motor skills, and perceptual learning to see if there is a difference in effectiveness between caffeine and naps.
A day of tests
Participants came into the lab in the morning, and were trained on three different tasks – a verbal task (involving the memorization of lists of words), a motor task (involving tapping fingers on a keyboard in a particular sequence for speed and accuracy), and a perceptual task (involving picking out two targets against a background designed to make this a little tricky).
At noon, they were given lunch. And at 1pm, they were randomly assigned to either a “nap” group or “drug” group (i.e. caffeine or placebo).
The nappers then took a nap (90-minutes max), while the drug group spent that time listening to a book on tape.
At 3pm, nappers were awake, and half the drug folks were given a 200mg caffeine pill, while the other half received a placebo.
At 4pm, everyone was tested on all three tasks.
The caffeine group reported feeling more alert right before their tests than either the nap or placebo groups.
However, when it came to performance, alertness didn’t necessarily equate to better scores. Lo and behold, the nappers outperformed their caffeine counterparts on both the verbal memory task and the motor learning task.
The motor learning task results were particularly interesting, in that while the folks who took naps or a placebo pill demonstrated significant improvement and turned in markedly higher scores from the morning session to the afternoon session, the caffeine group did not show improvement from morning to afternoon. Their learning seemed to be impaired.
It’s as if they started right back where they left off, whereas the nappers and placebo group experienced greater consolidation of their motor memory, seemingly picking back up at a higher level than where they had ended the morning session.
The limits of caffeine
At the end of the day, it seems that while caffeine is certainly an effective way of staying alert and awake, there are some limits.
Specifically, that while you may really love your 4pm grande mochachocolattespresso, it’s not a complete substitute for sleep. Feeling more alert is great – but it doesn’t necessarily translate to improved memory, learning, and performance on other more complex cognitive tasks.
So the next time you’re feeling a wee bit sluggish and starting to nod off in the practice room, try a short power nap instead of taking a trip to your corner Starbucks.
How long a nap is best?
Well, it seems to depend on what you need, and how much time you have.
Performance psychologist and Juilliard alumnus & faculty member Noa Kageyama teaches musicians how to beat performance anxiety and play their best under pressure through live classes, coachings, and an online home-study course. Based in NYC, he is married to a terrific pianist, has two hilarious kids, and is a wee bit obsessed with technology and all things Apple.
After Countless Hours of Practice, Why Are Performances Still so Hit or Miss?
It’s not a talent issue. And that rush of adrenaline and emotional roller coaster you experience before performances is totally normal too.
Performing at the upper ranges of your ability under pressure is a unique skill – one that requires specific mental skills and a few tweaks in your approach to practicing. Elite athletes have been learning these techniques for decades; if nerves and self-doubt have been recurring obstacles in your performances, I’d like to help you do the same.
Click below to discover the 7 skills that are characteristic of top performers. Learn how you can develop these into strengths of your own. And begin to see tangible improvements in your playing that transfer to the stage.
NOTE: Version 3.0 is coming soon! A whole new format, completely redone from the ground up, with new research-based strategies on practice and performance preparation, 25 step-by-step practice challenges, unlockable bonus content, and more. There will be a price increase when version 3.0 arrives, but if you enroll in the “Lifetime” edition before then, you’ll get all the latest updates for free.