Feeling Stuck? Here’s a Counterintuitive Strategy for Boosting Creativity in the Practice Room

“One thing at a time!!!” is a common saying around our house as my daughter tries to alternate between watching her brother’s Pokémon show on TV and reading a book. Or as my son tries to play NBA Live on his phone while sneaking an occasional peek as his sister learns how to eat corn-on-the-cob with a power drill on YouTube.

We know that letting our attention shift, willy-nilly, from one thing to another – i.e. “task-switching” – is not such a good thing. And that it can have quite a few negative consequences, like increased distractibility,  mistakes, and anxiety – despite how common a phenomenon it is in our distraction-filled world today.

But on the flip side, we have that intense, laser-like focus where we put our blinders on, and beat our heads against the wall, trying to brute force our way to a solution, even though deep down, we know we’re totally stuck and probably ought to move on.

Is there a more effective and efficient way to maximize our creative problem-solving abilities?

The answer is a little surprising. Because it’s not something most people would think to do – and at first glance, sounds like it’d actually be kind of annoying.

Creativity’s nemesis

It was many years before I realized that practicing effectively actually requires quite a lot of creativity. Because on a fundamental level, much of our practice centers around problem-solving. Whether it’s a technical thing like figuring out the mechanics of a tricky string crossing. Or a musical issue like deciding how a quarter note at the end of a phrase with a dot on top of it ought to sound. Or, more often, some interaction of the technical and musical.

So to be maximally effective and efficient in our practice, we must not only be able to come up with a wide variety of ideas (divergent thinking), but think up effective solutions to the issue at hand (convergent thinking) too.

We’re more than capable of such thinking, but it has a nemesis. Which goes by the name “cognitive fixation.”

Cognitive fixation

Have you ever had one of those moments in the practice room where you suddenly fixate on a particular shift, note, or phrase, and totally lose track of time? And then 30 minutes later, snap out of it, realizing that not only have you failed to solve the problem, but now you’re ready for a nap?

This happens because once we get an idea stuck in our head, it can be difficult to see the problem again with fresh eyes (or ears). And even though continuing to hammer away at the problem can feel productive, the reality is that we often end up spinning our wheels, and running out of time and energy.

Research suggests that we can “unstuck” ourselves by taking a break. Because a break, in essence, helps us forget whatever it is that we were fixated on.

A little like trying to stay mad at a good friend. At first, you’re totally stewing over the grave injustice that’s been done, but then you get distracted by the day’s events, and soon forget why you were so mad in the first place.

Divergent thinking

Curious to see how we can beat stuck-ness, and give our creative powers a boost, a team of researchers at Columbia University ran a series of studies to investigate the benefits of task-switching.

115 participants were given 8 minutes to complete two divergent thinking tasks which involved brainstorming as many different uses as possible for a brick and a toothpick.

One group (continual-switching) was asked to switch between the two tasks after each new idea. So they’d do brick, toothpick, brick, toothpick, etc..

Another group (discretionary-switching) was asked to work on each task in any order they chose, and switch between tasks whenever they wished.

A third group (midpoint-switching) was asked to work on one task for 4 minutes, then switch to the other for 4 minutes.

What worked best?

The continual group switched more often (17.89 times) than the discretionary (7.55 times) and midpoint (once) groups.

And a set of trained judges found that the continual group indeed generated more dissimilar and novel ideas than either of the other groups. Presumably, having to switch back and forth forced the participants to think up more new ideas, instead of riffing off of the same idea they just thought up.

Convergent thinking

Then they ran another study with convergent thinking as the focus, with results that were even more compelling.

Verbal puzzles

104 participants were asked to solve two verbal puzzles. (e.g. Think of a word that when combined with the following words, creates a new word: water, skate, cream1.)

The continual group was asked to switch every 30 seconds. The discretionary group, was allowed to switch whenever they felt like it. And the midpoint group was asked to switch halfway through the 4-minute test.

Insight puzzles

Then they were asked to solve two visual insight puzzles in 12 minutes. The 9-dot puzzle, and the 6-coin puzzle.

The continual group switched every 90 seconds, the discretionary group whenever they wished, and the midpoint group midway through.

What worked best?

Continual switching led to a significantly greater success rate in solving both types of puzzles.

With the verbal puzzles, 88.6% of those in the continual group solved at least one, and 51.4% solved both. Compare that to 71.9% and 12.5% for the discretionary group. And 57.1% and 14.3% for the midpoint group.

The effect was even more pronounced with the insight puzzles. The continual group’s success rate was 75.8% (at least one puzzle) and 15.2% (both puzzles), compared to 32.1% and 7.1% for the discretionary group and 30.3% and 3% for the midpoint group.

Which strategy do people choose?

In four follow-up studies, the researchers found that when there’s a clear incentive to perform their best, the vast majority of people will avoid the continual-switching strategy, even though the data in these studies (and others) suggest it may be the most effective.

When given a choice, the continual strategy was selected 4%-9.9% of the time, while the discretionary strategy was selected 46.5% – 64.4% of the time, and the midpoint strategy 30.7% – 44.5% of the time.

Even leaders in K-12 education undervalued the benefits of task-switching, with selection rates of 7.4% for continual, 79.8% for discretionary, and 12.8% for midpoint.

Take action

There are times when we certainly need to spend a good chunk of time working on one phrase, but there are probably many times when we would benefit more from task-switching (between passages, not between practicing and Facebook!).

Where setting a timer, and forcing ourselves to switch between two passages might help us come up with better fingerings. Or help us get unstuck creatively, and figure out how to phrase ambiguous passages more convincingly.

At the very least, the study suggests that we ought to be much more conscious of moments when we start feeling stuck. And that we ought to avoid banging our head against a wall, thinking that this will lead to a brilliant idea through sheer determination and force of will.

Because while perseverance is a virtue, we can so often deceive ourselves into thinking we’re being productive, when in actuality, we’re just coming up with more variations of ideas that won’t work.

Footnotes

  1. The answer is: “ice”

Ack! After Countless Hours of Practice...
Why Are Performances Still So Hit or Miss?

For most of my life, I assumed that it was because I wasn’t practicing enough. And that eventually, if I performed enough, the nerves would just go away and everything would take care of itself.

But in the same way that “practice, practice, practice” wasn’t the answer, “perform, perform, perform” wasn’t the answer either. In fact, simply performing more, without the tools to facilitate more positive performance experiences, just led to more negative performance experiences!

Eventually, I discovered that elite athletes are successful in shrinking this gap between practice and performance, because their training looks fundamentally different. In that it includes specialized mental and physical practice strategies that are oriented around the retrieval of skills under pressure.

It was a very different approach to practice, that not only made performing a more positive experience, but practicing a more enjoyable experience too (which I certainly didn’t expect!).

If you’ve been wanting to perform more consistently and get more out of your daily practice, I’d love to share these research-based skills and strategies that can help you beat nerves and play more like yourself when it counts.

Click below to learn more about Beyond Practicing, and start enjoying more satisfying practice days that also transfer to the stage.

BOGO pricing is now in effect! (through 11:59pm Sunday)

Sign up anytime now through Sunday (Dec. 4) at 11:59pm Pacific, and you’ll receive a second bonus Beyond Practicing account – at no additional cost – that you can gift to a friend, colleague, family member, student, or teacher (i.e. a practice buddy to explore the course with 😁).

Click the red button below to learn more about the course and get the holiday buy-one-get-one-free offer.

Comments

5 Responses

  1. Nice! I usually divide my practice time in 25 minute chunks (pomodoro 😉 ) and inside those chunks I further divide it into 5 minute chunks in which I practice a single exercise/passage. However, sometimes my 5 minute session ends but I haven’t completed an error-free run. Not wanting to end it in that way I keep trying….sometimes for 15 or even 30 more minutes. Needless to say it isn’t very productive. I’m kind of feeling dumb for not noticing and fixing this so far. I guess sometimes you just need Captain Obvious 🙂

  2. Hi Noa,

    Long-time reader here–I’d be interested to know if you’ve looked at any research proposed in Cal Newport’s most recent book “Deep Work” and how it relates to this post. There’s a section in part one that discusses the downsides of task switching and the effects of “attention residue.”

    Here’s a paper discussing this concept further: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597809000399

    Thanks for this blog and your continued hard work!

    Cheers,
    Gabrielle

    1. Hi Gabrielle,

      Thanks for the note – and for linking to a related paper (which is awesome, because they often lead to future posts)! Like most things, I think the task-switching issue is nuanced. I’ve just started digging into it, but my take is that task-switching between similar tasks is not quite the same as task-switching between different tasks. And I think in particular, this creativity boost might be specific to “topic-switching” (vs. true task-switching) when the objective is essentially to brainstorm more ideas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15585

Join 48,000+ musicians!

Get the latest research-based tips to level up in the practice room and on stage, from one week to the next.

You'll also receive other insider resources like the weekly newsletter and a special 6-day series on essential research-based practice strategies that will help you get more out of your daily practice and perform more optimally on stage. (You can unsubscribe anytime.)

Download a

PDF version

Enter your email below to download this article as a PDF

Click the link below to convert this article to a PDF and download to your device.

Download a

PDF version

All set!

Discover your mental strengths and weaknesses

If performances have been frustratingly inconsistent, try the 3-min Mental Skills Audit. It won't tell you what Harry Potter character you are, but it will point you in the direction of some new practice methods that could help you level up in the practice room and on stage.

Share580
Tweet1
Email